Skip to main content
Skip to main content

LING Colloquium: Athulya Aravind (MIT)

Linguistics default inset media

LING Colloquium: Athulya Aravind (MIT)

Maryland Language Science Center | Linguistics Friday, April 8, 2022 3:00 pm - 5:00 pm 1310A/B
Zoom link: https://umd.zoom.us/my/jessicamendes Asymmetries in presupposition projection: processing and acquisition Presuppositions triggered in the right arguments of binary connectives such as and are sometimes inherited wholesale by the sentence, as illustrated in (1). Sometimes, however, the sentence as a whole presupposes something weaker, e.g. (2). (1) If Sam is traveling to London, she will bring her guitar on the trip.      [Presupposes: Sam has a guitar; presupposition inherited wholesale] (2) If Sam is a musician, she will bring her guitar to the party.     [Presupposes: If Sam is a musician, she has a guitar; weaker presupposition] There is disagreement about which of these cases is the "genuine" indicator of how presuppositions project from these environments, leading, in turn, to disagreements about the right theory of presupposition projection generally. The challenge is an empirical one: judgments about these presuppositional sentences are murky and easily influenced by extra-grammatical factors. In this talk, I present evidence from language acquisition and online processing aiming to clarify the empirical landscape. This evidence favors theories that predict that presuppositions triggered in the second clause of connectives project conditionally, as in (2).
Add to Calendar 04/08/22 15:00:00 04/08/22 17:00:00 America/New_York LING Colloquium: Athulya Aravind (MIT) Zoom link: https://umd.zoom.us/my/jessicamendes Asymmetries in presupposition projection: processing and acquisition Presuppositions triggered in the right arguments of binary connectives such as and are sometimes inherited wholesale by the sentence, as illustrated in (1). Sometimes, however, the sentence as a whole presupposes something weaker, e.g. (2). (1) If Sam is traveling to London, she will bring her guitar on the trip.      [Presupposes: Sam has a guitar; presupposition inherited wholesale] (2) If Sam is a musician, she will bring her guitar to the party.     [Presupposes: If Sam is a musician, she has a guitar; weaker presupposition] There is disagreement about which of these cases is the "genuine" indicator of how presuppositions project from these environments, leading, in turn, to disagreements about the right theory of presupposition projection generally. The challenge is an empirical one: judgments about these presuppositional sentences are murky and easily influenced by extra-grammatical factors. In this talk, I present evidence from language acquisition and online processing aiming to clarify the empirical landscape. This evidence favors theories that predict that presuppositions triggered in the second clause of connectives project conditionally, as in (2). false